<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft: The New Old Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techpaladin.com/2008/09/09/microsoft-the-new-old-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techpaladin.com/2008/09/09/microsoft-the-new-old-apple/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:57:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://techpaladin.com/2008/09/09/microsoft-the-new-old-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpaladin.com/?p=160#comment-299</guid>
		<description>&gt; Windows Live Writer, for example. I’ve heard it’s quite good, but why isn’t it bundled with Vista...?

Just maybe something to do with the fact that whenever Microsoft bundle middleware, they end up as the subject of an  EU or DoJ antitrust suit?

&gt; And what about Windows Life Photo Gallery? How does it differ from the Windows (non-Live) Photo Gallery that comes bundled with Vista? If you already uses one, what’s the benefit of the other?

WLPG is the newest version of WPG.  They just changed the name.  (Presumably because some marketing droid wanted to get the &quot;Live&quot; brand in every place they possibly could).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Windows Live Writer, for example. I’ve heard it’s quite good, but why isn’t it bundled with Vista&#8230;?</p>
<p>Just maybe something to do with the fact that whenever Microsoft bundle middleware, they end up as the subject of an  EU or DoJ antitrust suit?</p>
<p>&gt; And what about Windows Life Photo Gallery? How does it differ from the Windows (non-Live) Photo Gallery that comes bundled with Vista? If you already uses one, what’s the benefit of the other?</p>
<p>WLPG is the newest version of WPG.  They just changed the name.  (Presumably because some marketing droid wanted to get the &#8220;Live&#8221; brand in every place they possibly could).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amwe</title>
		<link>http://techpaladin.com/2008/09/09/microsoft-the-new-old-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Amwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 02:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpaladin.com/?p=160#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Careful--if you decide to go get an MBA, the evil Microsoft might just make you a job offer you can&#039;t refuse...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful&#8211;if you decide to go get an MBA, the evil Microsoft might just make you a job offer you can&#8217;t refuse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

