<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tech Paladin &#187; Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techpaladin.com/category/hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techpaladin.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:11:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The iPad</title>
		<link>http://techpaladin.com/2010/01/27/the-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://techpaladin.com/2010/01/27/the-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portable computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpaladin.com/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#8217;s finally released!  There&#8217;s not much I&#8217;m going to say because I&#8217;ve been working on its guts for months now, and it&#8217;s unlikely you don&#8217;t already have an opinion one way or another.  Either way, go check it out!  Admit, it, you want one.  I know you do.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s finally released!  There&#8217;s not much I&#8217;m going to say because I&#8217;ve been working on its guts for months now, and it&#8217;s unlikely you don&#8217;t already have an opinion one way or another.  Either way, <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/">go check it out</a>!  Admit, it, you want one.  I know you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techpaladin.com/2010/01/27/the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last hippo you&#8217;d want to trust</title>
		<link>http://techpaladin.com/2009/11/13/the-last-hippo-youd-want-to-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://techpaladin.com/2009/11/13/the-last-hippo-youd-want-to-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpaladin.com/?p=408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in college, I once discovered the BlueHippo company.  They&#8217;re a firm that sells laptops to poor people with the enticing prospect of no-credit-check financing.  But under the hood, they&#8217;re an incredibly sleazy, predatory company that makes their money based on their target market&#8217;s financial ignorance.  Take, for example, the following ad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in college, I once discovered the <a href="http://www.bluehippo.com/">BlueHippo</a> company.  They&#8217;re a firm that sells laptops to poor people with the enticing prospect of no-credit-check financing.  But under the hood, they&#8217;re an incredibly sleazy, predatory company that makes their money based on their target market&#8217;s financial ignorance.  Take, for example, the following ad from back in 2006, when I found it (I took a screenshot, and it&#8217;s obviously not around anymore):</p>
<p><center><img src="http://techpaladin.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/bluehippo_ad.jpg" class="thumbnail" /></center></p>
<p>See how many scummy things you can find in the ad!  Wow, a shitty laptop for only 52 payments of $50; what could be better!?  A couple of my friends and I were so outraged by this that we prank-called them a couple of times, just to see if they were really as unscrupulous as they seemed.  It turns out they pretty much were, dodging questions and offering half-answers when asked about the pricing structure, and simply lying outright regarding the product itself.  Don&#8217;t take my word for it; we actually recorded one of my friends!  The resulting conversation is enlightening, in a sad sort of way:</p>
<p><center><br />
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.google.com/reader/ui/3247397568-audio-player.swf?audioUrl=http://techpaladin.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BlueHippoPwnd.mp3" width="400" height="27" allowscriptaccess="never" quality="best" bgcolor="#ffffff" wmode="window" flashvars="playerMode=embedded" /><br />
</center></p>
<p>Here are a few of the outrages revealed by this conversation:</p>
<ol>
<li>The sales rep allows the customer to believe that he will only be making 5 weeks of payments and pay only a total of $380, rather than the full lifetime price of $2730 (!!!).</li>
<li>She lies about the length of the creditworthiness payment period: it&#8217;s actually 13 weeks, not 5.</li>
<li>She lies about the free printer deal, though the website clearly features it on the laptop page.</li>
<li>She lies about the computer&#8217;s specs: it has a 256K cache, not 256 Megabytes of RAM, and it has only a CD-ROM drive, not a CD-DVD combo drive.</li>
<li>She lies about the included software, saying it comes with word, which it obviously doesn&#8217;t.</li>
</ol>
<p>Thus it was with glee that I found an <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/11/like-taking-candy-computers-from-a-baby-the-poor.ars?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss">article on ArsTechnica</a> today describing the FTC&#8217;s probe into BlueHippo&#8217;s affairs.  They&#8217;ve discovered that BlueHippo raked in 15 million dollars and only shipped <strong>one</strong> PC.  That&#8217;s right, only one PC.  Based on the tactics their sales staff uses, I can believe it.</p>
<p>It sounds like the FTC is finally getting its act together to bring down the hammer, and I say it&#8217;s about time!  My friends and I were shocked three years ago when we discovered that a business like this actually existed, and I&#8217;m still shocked today that it hasn&#8217;t been shut down yet!</p>
<hr />
<p>On a somewhat related note, I&#8217;ll mention that I&#8217;m often asked how the poor will be protected from predatory scams like this in a Libertarian society.  The answer is actually pretty close to what the FTC is already supposed to do: enforce anti-fraud laws.  The sales rep my friend talked to over the phone flat-out lied to him, a potential purchaser.  That should be illegal.  Like, <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=federal+pound+me+in+the+ass+prison">Federal-pound-me-in-the-ass-prison</a> illegal.  The functioning of a market economy relies on sellers&#8217; and purchasers&#8217; abilities to make informed decisions.  When participants lie to each other, bad products get bought and sold; wealth is squandered; trust is lost; people feel cheated.</p>
<p>A more Libertarian society would recognize that the free flow of information is paramount to voluntary exchange and therefore harshly punish deception and fraud.  BlueHippo&#8217;s business is a textbook definition of these abuses.  The ArsTechnica article mentions some fees it has so far been forced to pay; a truly just restitution would see the company forced to return <strong>all</strong> the money it accumulated from its customers in a fraudulent fashion, and 100% of that money would go back to the victims, not the enforcement agency.  This would reduce the company&#8217;s lifetime revenue to zero, and its profit to something negative, thus putting it deep into debt and almost certainly probably out of business.  That sounds like a fair punishment to me, and it&#8217;s more than has actually happened in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techpaladin.com/2009/11/13/the-last-hippo-youd-want-to-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Canon CanoScan LIDE 100</title>
		<link>http://techpaladin.com/2009/10/26/review-canon-canoscan-lide-100/</link>
		<comments>http://techpaladin.com/2009/10/26/review-canon-canoscan-lide-100/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpaladin.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we&#8217;re still in the dark age of scanning.  You line up your document, do a butt-slow preview scan at low resolution, see if it&#8217;s lined up, re-align until it&#8217;s not, and repeat until you either get the piece of paper where you want it or else set your hair on fire out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;re still in the dark age of scanning.  You line up your document, do a butt-slow preview scan at low resolution, see if it&#8217;s lined up, re-align until it&#8217;s not, and repeat until you either get the piece of paper where you want it or else set your hair on fire out of frustration.  I mean, imagine this: a scanner with a 5FPS camera in it that transmits live video of your document so you can align it on-the-fly without having to resort to those lousy preview scans.  Boy that would be cool.  Sad to say, I&#8217;ve never stumbled on such a device.</p>
<p>What I have stumbled on is the Canon CanoScan LIDE 100 scanner.<sup>1</sup>  It&#8217;s a very neat, very thin, and very cheap desktop scanner.  You can get the dang thing for about 60 or 70 bucks, but when I found a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001DJDGXA?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=techpaladin-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B001DJDGXA">$50 deal on Amazon</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=techpaladin-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B001DJDGXA" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> a few months ago, I had to pull the trigger.  Here&#8217;s what it looks like on my desk beside a horde of Orks and Tyranids:</p>
<p><img src="http://techpaladin.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/canon_scanner.jpg" alt="canon_scanner.jpg" class="thumbnail" align="left" /></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t really say much about the included software because I tossed it out without even looking at it.  My time in IT has taught me that scanner software that comes from the manufacturer is universally, 100% shoddy beyond belief.  Why is this?  I&#8217;m honestly confused.</p>
<p>I instead elected to use Mac OS X&#8217;s built-in Image Capture software, which I find to be not only perfectly sufficient for my purposes, but also quite pleasant to use (caveat: I&#8217;m talking about the Snow Leopard version.  In Leopard and before, it&#8217;s kinda lousy too).  The scan button on the front even opens Image Capture and starts a scan, just like it should!  How cool is that?</p>
<p>I mostly use it for scanning receipts, documents, and things like that, because I am obsessed with <a href="http://www.theplacewithnoname.com/blogs/klessons/p/0006.html">disaster preparedness</a> and I want records of everything I own in case the place blows up and my renter&#8217;s insurance company <a href="http://www.theplacewithnoname.com/blogs/klessons/p/0008.html">is being a dick.</a>  For that purpose, the scans it produces are perfectly nice-looking, and text is extremely sharp and crisp.</p>
<p>In terms of speed, I have to admit it&#8217;s not the fastest scanner in the world.  From placing the document on the bed to having a file on disk, it&#8217;ll probably take you maybe 30-45 seconds to have a finished product.  But that&#8217;s perfectly suitable for my relatively infrequent needs.</p>
<p>The one issue I&#8217;ve had is that sometimes Image Capture can&#8217;t find the scanner.  I don&#8217;t know if this is Image Capture or the scanner&#8217;s fault, but momentarily unplugging it never fails to beat whichever is the guilty party into comprehension of the other.  Works for me!</p>
<p>For a $50 scanner, it&#8217;s held up great, and produces good results.  It makes a great addition to my home office and if you need an unobtrusive, low-duty scanner, this one is pretty nice.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong>  I forgot to mention that the scanner is also USB-powered, which means that it doesn&#8217;t have to be plugged into the wall, which saves power and reduces clutter.  I find it sort of silly that I neglected to mention this, since it was one of the primary features that drew me to it!  Oh well, better late then never.</p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_360" class="footnote">FCC notice: you&#8217;ll never know whether or not Canon has <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ftc_is_looking_into_blogger_freebies.php">sent me free stuff</a>, fuckers!  Bite me.</li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techpaladin.com/2009/10/26/review-canon-canoscan-lide-100/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
